Response says
The Board partly disagrees: application information is posted during the open period, but application-procedure timelines are absent; jury-service term dates are present.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F4
Application procedures and timelines
What should residents consider about Finding F4: Application procedures and timelines, and the County’s response?
El Dorado County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The accepted timeline gap and disputed absence of application information are distinguished, with a named tab and open-period condition. The explanation directly covers both propositions.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The accepted timeline gap and disputed absence of application information are distinguished, with a named tab and open-period condition. The explanation directly covers both propositions.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...