Response says
The Board wholly disagrees, citing eligibility requirements and disqualifications in the “Apply to Join” tab.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F3
Eligibility for service
What should residents consider about Finding F3: Eligibility for service, and the County’s response?
El Dorado County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Whole disagreement, the specific location, and eligible/ineligible content address the finding. Page 3 continues the IT posting process. This score does not verify the website at the time investigated.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Whole disagreement, the specific location, and eligible/ineligible content address the finding. Page 3 continues the IT posting process. This score does not verify the website at the time investigated.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...