Response says
The Board wholly disagrees, citing the landing page’s explanation of what a jury is, its role, and how it operates.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F2
Jury role and authority
What should residents consider about Finding F2: Jury role and authority, and the County’s response?
El Dorado County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The named landing page and content-change agreement support the explanation. The response addresses role and operation but does not separately explain the finding’s authority and comprehensiveness concerns.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
4/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 1/2
- Reason specificity
- 1/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The named landing page and content-change agreement support the explanation. The response addresses role and operation but does not separately explain the finding’s authority and comprehensiveness concerns.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...