Response says
Partially disagrees: prior assessments used impact/likelihood scoring and management surveys; methodology can be better documented.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding BART2608-F38
F38: Internal Audit’s risk assessment methodology does not comply with IIA Standards 9.3 and 9.4 because it does not include documented scoring criteria, risk-weighting factors, a defined process for gathering risk information, or evidence of management input.
What should residents consider about Finding BART2608-F38: F38: Internal Audit’s risk assessment methodology does not comply with IIA Standards 9.3 and 9.4 because it does not include documented scoring criteria, risk-weighting factors, a defined process for gathering risk information, or evidence of management input., and the County’s response?
BART Board of DirectorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Engages scoring, weighting, information gathering and input using IIA9.3/9.4 and identified assessment methods.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Engages scoring, weighting, information gathering and input using IIA9.3/9.4 and identified assessment methods.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...