Response says
Disagrees: applies GAGAS9.57 to internal audits, argues public distribution is not mandatory and disclosure risks require review.
What should residents consider about Finding BART2608-F37: F37: There are no documented restrictions precluding public availability of Internal Audit’s completed audit reports, indicating that BART’s Internal Audit function does not comply with the public distribution requirements of GAGAS Section 9.56., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
Disagrees: applies GAGAS9.57 to internal audits, argues public distribution is not mandatory and disclosure risks require review.
Audit analysis
Explicit whole disagreement with standard-specific interpretation and confidentiality rationale.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
6/6
Public usefulness
Explicit whole disagreement with standard-specific interpretation and confidentiality rationale.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.