Response says
Disagrees, citing Internal Audit Manual2026 guidance on appropriate recipients and GAGAS9.57 risk assessment.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding BART2608-F35
F35: There is no documented policy establishing how Internal Audit reports are to be distributed to the Audit Committee following completion of an engagement, as required by GAGAS Section 9.57 and IIA Standard 15.1.
What should residents consider about Finding BART2608-F35: F35: There is no documented policy establishing how Internal Audit reports are to be distributed to the Audit Committee following completion of an engagement, as required by GAGAS Section 9.57 and IIA Standard 15.1., and the County’s response?
BART Board of DirectorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Identifies documented guidance and the reason it differs from unrestricted distribution; legality/conformity remains attributed.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Identifies documented guidance and the reason it differs from unrestricted distribution; legality/conformity remains attributed.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...