Response says
Agrees with clarification: summaries support oversight; full reports may contain asset vulnerabilities and require risk-based distribution under GAGAS9.57.
What should residents consider about Finding BART2608-F34: F34: Complete Internal Audit reports were not provided to the Audit Committee on a consistent basis in connection with Internal Audit’s appearances., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
Agrees with clarification: summaries support oversight; full reports may contain asset vulnerabilities and require risk-based distribution under GAGAS9.57.
Audit analysis
Explains why reports are not always broadly distributed using a named standard; appropriateness of restrictions is not independently verified.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
6/6
Public usefulness
Explains why reports are not always broadly distributed using a named standard; appropriateness of restrictions is not independently verified.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.