Response says
Agrees and says the 2026 protocol now contains activation criteria.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding BOS2607-F28
F28: CCRMC’s APOT Reduction Protocol does not provide specific criteria for activation of the protocol, as required by California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 9, Chapter 1.2, Section 100002.03.
What should residents consider about Finding BOS2607-F28: F28: CCRMC’s APOT Reduction Protocol does not provide specific criteria for activation of the protocol, as required by California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 9, Chapter 1.2, Section 100002.03., and the County’s response?
Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors; Contra Costa County Fire Protection DistrictAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Named revision offers a checkable basis but does not reproduce or independently verify those criteria.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
5/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 1/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Named revision offers a checkable basis but does not reproduce or independently verify those criteria.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...