Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F6

Training gaps versus staffing/substitute shortages

What should residents consider about Finding F6: Training gaps versus staffing/substitute shortages, and the County’s response?

Colusa County Superintendent of Schools and Assistant Superintendent of Special Education/SELPAAudit assessment: Unclear
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

CCOE agrees with its F6 paraphrase about staffing shortages and insufficient substitutes, describing recruitment and coverage protocols on pages 6–7.

Audit analysis

Published F6 concerns training gaps in CPI, autism/ABA and documentation. Response F6 agrees with a different staffing-shortage statement. It must not be scored as agreement with published F6. The same-number jury link is retained only to expose the discrepancy, not certify a substantive match. No numeric score is assigned.

Finding-response score unavailable

Finding mapping ambiguous

Published F6 concerns training gaps in CPI, autism/ABA and documentation. Response F6 agrees with a different staffing-shortage statement. It must not be scored as agreement with published F6.

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is