Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
California Civil Grand Jury reports

Colusa County Civil Grand Jury

Read findings and recommendations from Colusa County Civil Grand Jury reports, compare recorded agency responses, and explore the questions they raise.

Report cycles
1 report cycles
Official reports
3 official reports
Civic questions
6 civic questions

Official sources

All reports by year

Open a report overview for its summary, related civic questions, and official PDF.

2025–2026

View cycle

2025–2026 report

City of Williams

Investigates municipal finances, procurement, executive oversight, staff treatment and transparency. The jury issues 11 findings and six recommendations covering governance/ethics training, credit-card controls, executive hiring, staffing review and public completion reporting. Allegations and Brown Act concerns are attributed to the jury, not independent legal findings. The Council disputes the findings; Councilmember Troughton supplies a distinct response. This unchanged 23-page annual report contains the investigation on physical PDF pages 8–13 (printed pages 1–6).

2025–2026 report

Inspection of the Colusa County Jail

Examines the existing linear jail, new podular facility and planned transition of inmate medical care from WellPath to the County. Four findings describe professional operation, inspections, design risks and the medical transition; R1 calls for close monitoring of County-provided care. The Board response is supplied, but no separate Sheriff response is in this intake. This unchanged annual report contains the investigation on physical PDF pages 14–16 (printed pages 7–9).

2025–2026 report

Colusa County Civil Grand Jury Special Education Investigation Report

Examines IEP service delivery, staff training, parent communication, student safety, placement capacity, assistive technology and dignity. Eight findings and eight recommendations call for record integrity, tracking/remedies, training, oversight, reporting and service capacity. The joint CCOE/SELPA response disputes systemic characterizations and describes planned changes. Its F2/F3/F4/F6 paraphrases differ materially from the published findings; those nominally numbered audit links are explicitly unscorable. This unchanged annual report contains the investigation and glossary on physical PDF pages 17–23 (printed pages 10–16).