Response says
CCOE partially disagrees with its own F2 paraphrase about inaccurate records/post-meeting alterations, citing locking, parental amendments and biweekly-to-monthly audits.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F2
IEP access and staff training versus document integrity
What should residents consider about Finding F2: IEP access and staff training versus document integrity, and the County’s response?
Colusa County Superintendent of Schools and Assistant Superintendent of Special Education/SELPAAudit assessment: Unclear
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Published F2 concerns staff access to IEP details and training. The response’s F2 instead concerns document integrity. Other response sections discuss training, but there is no reliable one-to-one mapping of this numbered entry. The same-number jury link is retained only to expose the discrepancy, not certify a substantive match. No numeric score is assigned.
Finding-response score unavailable
Finding mapping ambiguous
Published F2 concerns staff access to IEP details and training. The response’s F2 instead concerns document integrity. Other response sections discuss training, but there is no reliable one-to-one mapping of this numbered entry.
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...