Response says
The County disagrees, citing State review of its annual reports and asserting it need not exceed legal reporting requirements.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F2
Recording violations in inspection reports
What should residents consider about Finding F2: Recording violations in inspection reports, and the County’s response?
Calaveras County Board of SupervisorsResponse dated 2025-08-12Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The disagreement and reason are explicit, but the response does not resolve the specific omission of violations or the asserted consequence for lead-agency authority. Annual inspection reports provide a checkable record type.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
4/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 1/2
- Reason specificity
- 1/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The disagreement and reason are explicit, but the response does not resolve the specific omission of violations or the asserted consequence for lead-agency authority. Annual inspection reports provide a checkable record type.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...