Response says
The County agrees and says the zoning code and General Plan do not require these updates.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F1
Annual mining reports to the Board
What should residents consider about Finding F1: Annual mining reports to the Board, and the County’s response?
Calaveras County Board of SupervisorsResponse dated 2025-08-12Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The agreement covers the finding, identifies the local provisions behind its explanation, and leaves the jury’s legal interpretation unresolved.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The agreement covers the finding, identifies the local provisions behind its explanation, and leaves the jury’s legal interpretation unresolved.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...