Response says
The County agrees and identifies mailed complaints as the acknowledgement gap.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F1
Acknowledging complaints across submission methods
What should residents consider about Finding F1: Acknowledging complaints across submission methods, and the County’s response?
Calaveras County Board of SupervisorsResponse dated 2025-07-22Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The response covers the submission-method problem, explains existing in-person and online confirmations, and identifies the complaint form as the source of follow-up instructions.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The response covers the submission-method problem, explains existing in-person and online confirmations, and identifies the complaint form as the source of follow-up instructions.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...