Response says
The District disagrees while acknowledging temporary inefficiencies and describing software benefits and implementation work.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F5
Software integration inefficiencies
What should residents consider about Finding F5: Software integration inefficiencies, and the County’s response?
Calaveras County Water District Board of DirectorsResponse dated 2024-10-03Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Pages 7–8 provide concrete billing-hour comparisons, the September 2021 implementation, and the August 20, 2024 Finance Committee timeline. The response identifies its position and rationale across the finding.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Pages 7–8 provide concrete billing-hour comparisons, the September 2021 implementation, and the August 20, 2024 Finance Committee timeline. The response identifies its position and rationale across the finding.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...