Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← All civic questions
Water District costs and oversight

How should the Water District support safe employee feedback and consistent performance reviews?

The jury raises concerns about fear of retaliation and inconsistent performance reviews and recommends outside workplace assistance and stronger evaluation practices. The District disputes the workplace finding. This question invites discussion of reporting channels, confidentiality, and useful measures of follow-through.

Why this matters

Employees need clear expectations and credible ways to raise concerns; residents benefit from knowing how management follows up without exposing private personnel information.

Participate in this conversation

Public participation

Participate in this conversation

Use Pol.is below to respond to statements, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is

Supporting evidence

Evidence from the report

This Phase 1 citation points back to the source material that informed the civic question.

Supporting report

Calaveras County Water District: Still Waters Run Deep

Report section
Findings, Recommendations, Respondents—F6, R6, F7 and R7a
Source citation
Calaveras County Water District: Still Waters Run Deep, Findings, Recommendations, Respondents—F6, R6, F7 and R7a, PDF page 15.
View referenced source