The jury questions the distribution of the five-year increase and recommends recalculation. The question asks what explanations and comparisons would make the allocation understandable; it does not assume the jury’s conclusion resolves the dispute.
Why this matters
Ratepayers need clear explanations of the costs underlying their bills.
Public participation
Use Pol.is below to respond to statements, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider.
Supporting evidence
This Phase 1 citation points back to the source material that informed the civic question.
Supporting report