Response says
Partially agrees that community members pass public-records responses to trustees, but says most information comes through the Superintendent and disputes the implied scale of alternative channels.
What should residents consider about Finding F26-40: Information channels to board members, and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
Partially agrees that community members pass public-records responses to trustees, but says most information comes through the Superintendent and disputes the implied scale of alternative channels.
Audit analysis
Accepted conduct and disputed prevalence are clearly identified with specific reasoning but no communications dataset is identified.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
5/6
Public usefulness
Accepted conduct and disputed prevalence are clearly identified with specific reasoning but no communications dataset is identified.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.