Response says
Disagrees because the named committees no longer exist: the Superintendent committee ended, the Budget Taskforce had a one-time 2023–24 purpose, and the Community Schools Taskforce never formed; page 6 promises handbook deletion.
What should residents consider about Finding F26-39: Community advisory committees, and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
Disagrees because the named committees no longer exist: the Superintendent committee ended, the Budget Taskforce had a one-time 2023–24 purpose, and the Community Schools Taskforce never formed; page 6 promises handbook deletion.
Audit analysis
Explains the whole disagreement through distinct histories of all three committees and the dated budget taskforce purpose; these are agency assertions.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
6/6
Public usefulness
Explains the whole disagreement through distinct histories of all three committees and the dated budget taskforce purpose; these are agency assertions.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.