Response says
YCSO aligns with MJUSD. The quoted district position acknowledges qualitative rather than centralized data-driven evaluation and proposes surveys, logs and diversion measures.
What should residents consider about Finding SHERIFF-F3: The SRO program does not utilize standardized performance metrics or a centralized data-driven evaluation framework to assess effectiveness across school sites., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
YCSO aligns with MJUSD. The quoted district position acknowledges qualitative rather than centralized data-driven evaluation and proposes surveys, logs and diversion measures.
Audit analysis
The finding response describes a future district framework, whereas YCSO’s R3 answer on page 5 only promises to consider metrics. Do not treat these as a single unconditional Sheriff implementation promise.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
5/6
Public usefulness
Alignment with MJUSD is not an explicit jury-finding position. The qualitative-evaluation admission covers the finding and the proposed indicators are concrete, but no existing evaluation record is identified.
Scoring confidence: medium
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.