Response says
The Manager partially disagrees and describes public input, project documents and targeted construction notices, while acknowledging website improvements.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding MANAGER-F3
There is a lack of communication with residents regarding the street maintenance program.
What should residents consider about Finding MANAGER-F3: There is a lack of communication with residents regarding the street maintenance program., and the County’s response?
Marysville City Council and Marysville City ManagerResponse dated 2026-08-20Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The response distinguishes tentative planning information from construction-ready notice rather than promising fixed dates.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The disputed scope and admitted improvement area are explicit. Specific communication stages and Council agendas, staff reports and notices provide traceable sources.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...