Response says
The Council partially disagrees, identifies public project discussions, accepts website accessibility opportunities and explains why preliminary schedules change.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding COUNCIL-F3
There is a lack of communication with residents regarding the street maintenance program.
What should residents consider about Finding COUNCIL-F3: There is a lack of communication with residents regarding the street maintenance program., and the County’s response?
Marysville City Council and Marysville City ManagerResponse dated 2026-08-20Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Existing channels do not by themselves establish that all residents can readily find the information.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Partial disagreement separates existing communication from website improvement opportunities, explains constraints and identifies budget discussions, approvals and contract awards as checkable channels.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...