Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Finding F2

Finding F2

Findings

The SRO program operates with overlapping school-based and law enforcement response frameworks for discipline, behavioral health and crime response.

Jury report: Guardians and Gatekeepers: The Role of SROs in Our Schools and Communities · PDF page 18

Permanent link

Official responses

Yuba County Sheriff’s Department

YCSO agrees with MJUSD’s position that school discipline remains separate from law enforcement; searches and crisis support have defined safety roles.

Read official response · PDF page 2

The response addresses discipline, behavioral health and criminal intervention but does not explicitly say whether YCSO agrees or disagrees with the jury’s finding. The matrix continues on page 3.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Wheatland Union High School District Board of Trustees and Superintendent

The Board agrees that the frameworks operate concurrently, cites its written decision and notification protocols, and says behavioral-health lines are being further documented.

Read official response · PDF page 47

The response distinguishes existing discipline/crime protocols from a behavioral-health component still being formalized.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Marysville Joint Unified School District Board President and Superintendent

MJUSD disagrees, distinguishes administrator discipline from safety-related searches and protective behavioral-health support, and supplies an enforcement boundary matrix.

Read official response · PDF page 89

This is MJUSD’s described operational boundary, not a legal determination that every intervention follows it.

  • Review the administrative versus enforcement matrix with SROs and administrators annually and reinforce it in ongoing weekly briefings. Owner: MJUSD Director of Student Welfare & Attendance and law-enforcement leadership. Timing: Not specified.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all findingsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions