Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Finding F1

Finding F1

Findings

The roles and responsibilities of SROs are not formally defined or standardized across participating school sites, resulting in variation in execution and expectations.

Jury report: Guardians and Gatekeepers: The Role of SROs in Our Schools and Communities · PDF page 18

Permanent link

Official responses

Yuba County Sheriff’s Department

YCSO says it agrees with MJUSD, whose core roles it describes as standardized; daily assignment differences are attributed to geography and mutual aid. A jointly agreed role matrix follows on page 2.

Read official response · PDF page 1

The response implies disagreement with the jury’s lack-of-standardization conclusion while acknowledging variation. The named matrix is support within the response, not proof of countywide adoption.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Wheatland Union High School District Board of Trustees and Superintendent

The Board agrees that countywide roles were not historically standardized; it says its spring 2026 manual substantially addresses the local gap.

Read official response · PDF page 47

The local manual is supplied at pages 51–84. A local implementation claim does not establish countywide standardization.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Marysville Joint Unified School District Board President and Superintendent

MJUSD partially disagrees: physical assignments vary but core roles and oversight are said to be standardized. A jointly agreed written role matrix appears in the packet.

Read official response · PDF page 87

The packet supplies written definitions, not independent evidence of consistent execution at every county site. The matrix continues on page 89.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all findingsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions