Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F19

The Sheriff’s Office does not adequately review the documented outside employment by sworn officers.

What should residents consider about Finding F19: The Sheriff’s Office does not adequately review the documented outside employment by sworn officers., and the County’s response?

County respondents; Sheriff’s Office; Yolo LAFCoAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

Partly disagrees: review exists but can occur more frequently.

Audit analysis

The response distinguishes existing reviews from the frequency improvement it accepts. It offers no completed independent audit demonstrating that earlier reviews were adequate.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

9/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

5/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
1/2

The response distinguishes existing reviews from the frequency improvement it accepts. It offers no completed independent audit demonstrating that earlier reviews were adequate.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is