Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← All civic questions
Response Follow-Through

What explanations make partial or whole disagreement with a jury finding understandable to the public?

The continuity introduction describes agreement and reasoned disagreement requirements. The question invites discussion of clarity rather than favoring agreement over disagreement.

Why this matters

A clear disputed scope and explanation help residents compare the finding with the response.

Participate in this conversation

Public participation

Participate in this conversation

Use Pol.is below to respond to statements, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is

Supporting evidence

Evidence from the report

This Phase 1 citation points back to the source material that informed the civic question.

Supporting report

Continuity Report: Summary of Responses to the 2024–2025 Reports

Report section
Finding-response requirements
Source citation
Source: Continuity Report: Summary of Responses to the 2024–2025 Reports, Finding-response requirements, physical PDF page 73.
View referenced source