Response says
Agrees with F2 on the response form.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F2
The Stewardship Reserve Fund is currently invested at the County’s highly conservative low rate of return. This may be insufficient to meet the long-term goal of providing stewardship in perpetuity.
What should residents consider about Finding F2: The Stewardship Reserve Fund is currently invested at the County’s highly conservative low rate of return. This may be insufficient to meet the long-term goal of providing stewardship in perpetuity., and the County’s response?
Sonoma County Board of Supervisors / Ag+OS Board of DirectorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Explicit agreement identifies the entire finding; no explanation is required for agreement. The form itself provides no supporting explanation for the investment conclusion.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
2/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 0/2
- Support traceability
- 0/2
Explicit agreement identifies the entire finding; no explanation is required for agreement. The form itself provides no supporting explanation for the investment conclusion.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...