Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Report overview
Response synthesis and audit

Sonoma County Board of Supervisors / Ag+OS Board of Directors response

The boards agree with F1 and F2 and partially disagree with F3. They report meeting notices implemented, an investment-adviser process underway, and an alternative quarterly ownership-check procedure instead of Recorder notifications.

Official response PDFOfficial report PDF

Response by Sonoma County Board of Supervisors / Ag+OS Board of Directors

6

Addressed

0

Partially addressed

0

Not addressed

0

Unclear

County's stated disposition

These categories reflect the County's response to each recommendation, separate from this audit's assessment.

1

Implemented

1

Will be implemented

0

Requires further analysis

1

Will not be implemented

0

Unclear

How to read this audit

Editorial review of the submitted response only; not a legal ruling or independent verification of agency claims. Citations use physical PDF pages, including blank scanned backs. Blank signature/date fields and court receipt stamps do not establish an adoption or response date.

Commitments

Actions stated in the response

These are commitments extracted from the County's response. They describe what the response says will happen; they do not verify that implementation occurred.

1

Extracted commitments

1

Definite or bounded timing

0

Conditional timing

0

No timeframe

R2 · Exact date

Return to the Board of Directors to award an investment-adviser services contract.

2026-12-31

Item-by-item review

Findings and recommendations

Assessments describe whether the response engages each cited item. Finding scores separately describe statutory-elements completeness under California Penal Code § 933.05(a) and public usefulness. They do not independently verify the response or constitute a legal conclusion.

Showing 6 of 6 items

finding · F1

Public meetings of the Ag+OS Board of Directors are publicly noticed by the County as Board of Supervisors meetings but do not appear on the Ag+OS website listing of public meetings. This may leave interested members of the public uninformed of the meetings.

Audit: Addressed

Response says

Agrees with F1 on the response form.

Audit analysis

Explicit agreement identifies the entire finding; no explanation is required for agreement. The form provides no finding-specific reasoning or supporting record.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

6/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

2/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
0/2
Support traceability
0/2

Explicit agreement identifies the entire finding; no explanation is required for agreement. The form provides no finding-specific reasoning or supporting record.

Scoring confidence: high

Report page 18Response page 1
Discuss finding and response

finding · F2

The Stewardship Reserve Fund is currently invested at the County’s highly conservative low rate of return. This may be insufficient to meet the long-term goal of providing stewardship in perpetuity.

Audit: Addressed

Response says

Agrees with F2 on the response form.

Audit analysis

Explicit agreement identifies the entire finding; no explanation is required for agreement. The form itself provides no supporting explanation for the investment conclusion.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

6/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

2/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
0/2
Support traceability
0/2

Explicit agreement identifies the entire finding; no explanation is required for agreement. The form itself provides no supporting explanation for the investment conclusion.

Scoring confidence: high

Report page 18Response page 1
Discuss finding and response

finding · F3

The Recorder’s Office does not notify Ag+OS when ownership of a protected property changes. This may impair Ag+OS stewardship of a conservation easement.

Audit: Addressed

Response says

Acknowledges no Recorder notifications, but says an Ag+OS ownership-check procedure and the public grantor/grantee index provide alternatives.

Audit analysis

Partial disagreement distinguishes the absence of notification from its asserted impact on stewardship, with an identified public index and cross-reference to the R3 procedure on page 3.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

10/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

6/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

Partial disagreement distinguishes the absence of notification from its asserted impact on stewardship, with an identified public index and cross-reference to the R3 procedure on page 3.

Scoring confidence: high

Report page 18Response page 2
Discuss finding and response

recommendation · R1

By August 1, 2026 the Ag+OS Board of Directors/Board of Supervisors direct Ag+OS staff to include notification of Board of Directors meetings, with a link to the agenda, in the location established on its website for Public Meeting announcements. (F1)

County: ImplementedAudit: Addressed

Response says

Reports that Board meeting notices and agenda links have been added to the Public Meetings webpage.

Audit analysis

Identifies the claimed completed action and a checkable webpage. This review does not independently verify the webpage.

Report page 18Response page 2

recommendation · R2

By August 1, 2026 the Board of Supervisors direct the Auditor-Controller-Treasurer- Tax Collector and the Administrator of the Sonoma County Employees’ Retirement Association Investment Managers to collaborate in pursuing a higher rate of return on the Ag+OS Stewardship Reserve Fund and report their recommendations to the Board of Directors by December 31, 2026. (F2)

County: Will be implementedAudit: Addressed

Response says

Describes the March 24, 2026 investment-adviser RFP, a proposed investment-policy amendment and a planned contract award by December 31, 2026.

Audit analysis

Engages the investment objective and gives a Board return date. Page 3 makes consultation with the retirement association conditional on pursuing a legislative change, rather than promising the exact collaboration requested.

Extracted commitments

Return to the Board of Directors to award an investment-adviser services contract.

Responsible party
Ag+OS and Auditor-Controller-Treasurer-Tax Collector
Deliverable
Board consideration of investment-adviser contract award
Timing
2026-12-31 · Exact date
Report page 19Response page 2

recommendation · R3

By August 1, 2026 the Board of Supervisors direct the Recorder’s Office to flag properties under Ag+OS Stewardship and create a system to notify Ag+OS of changes in ownership within 30 days of recording. (F3)

County: Will not be implementedAudit: Addressed

Response says

Declines Recorder flagging and notification; describes automated parcel checks every 90 days and follow-up with new owners.

Audit analysis

Explains Recorder system limitations and the alternative process. The alternative is not the requested notification within 30 days.

Report page 19Response page 3