Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Finding F2

Finding F2

By allowing NBAS to default on reporting requirements, the City Manager’s Office was unable to effectively evaluate NBAS’s performance and provide the bi-annual reports to the City Council as required by Resolution No. 2022-111 N.C.S.

Jury report: Animal Services Revisited: A City Asleep at the Wheel · PDF page 16

Permanent link

Official response

Petaluma City Council

Acknowledges inconsistent formal reporting but says communications, consultant work and Council proceedings allowed some evaluation.

Read official response · PDF page 7

Separates deficient standardized reports from inability to evaluate at all, gives relevant alternative information channels and describes corrective procurement work, without identifying specific received reports or communications.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all findingsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions