Response says
Agrees that posting deficiencies occurred and describes corrective procedures.
What should residents consider about Finding F3: The Board of Trustees did not consistently post agendas per the Brown Act. As of April 2026, the Grand Jury has verified that the SMCD’s agendas are being posted in a proper manner., and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
Agrees that posting deficiencies occurred and describes corrective procedures.
Audit analysis
Pages 3–4 distinguish past deficiencies from designated public and website posting, annual Brown Act training and continuing review. This engages both historical noncompliance and the jury’s acknowledgement of correction; ongoing legal compliance is not independently established.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
6/6
Public usefulness
Pages 3–4 distinguish past deficiencies from designated public and website posting, annual Brown Act training and continuing review. This engages both historical noncompliance and the jury’s acknowledgement of correction; ongoing legal compliance is not independently established.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.