Response says
SacRT disagrees that information is intentionally filtered or withheld and describes several Board channels.
What should residents consider about Finding F5-board: The Grand Jury finds the District Board receives filtered information from the MAC, leaving the Board with incomplete information about issues affecting the disabled ridership, and the County’s response?
Audit context
Response says
SacRT disagrees that information is intentionally filtered or withheld and describes several Board channels.
Audit analysis
Public minutes, summaries and supplemental procurement updates give specific context. They do not fully explain differences between the actual MAC minutes and staff summaries appended to the report; intent is not required by the finding.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
5/6
Public usefulness
Public minutes, summaries and supplemental procurement updates give specific context. They do not fully explain differences between the actual MAC minutes and staff summaries appended to the report; intent is not required by the finding.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Public participation
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.