Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F5-board

The Grand Jury finds the District Board receives filtered information from the MAC, leaving the Board with incomplete information about issues affecting the disabled ridership

What should residents consider about Finding F5-board: The Grand Jury finds the District Board receives filtered information from the MAC, leaving the Board with incomplete information about issues affecting the disabled ridership, and the County’s response?

Sacramento Regional Transit District Board of Directors; William Charles Johnson, MAC Chair (personal views)Audit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

SacRT disagrees that information is intentionally filtered or withheld and describes several Board channels.

Audit analysis

Public minutes, summaries and supplemental procurement updates give specific context. They do not fully explain differences between the actual MAC minutes and staff summaries appended to the report; intent is not required by the finding.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

8/10

3/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
1/2

5/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
1/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

Public minutes, summaries and supplemental procurement updates give specific context. They do not fully explain differences between the actual MAC minutes and staff summaries appended to the report; intent is not required by the finding.

Scoring confidence: high