Response says
The chair acknowledges app frustration but says its broader impact was overstated and other reservation channels remained available.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F3-mac-chair
The Grand Jury finds SacRT GO riders lost access to the Ecolane tracking app for an extended period of time, without clear and effective communication from the District, including the use of all available communication channels, resulting in a frustrating experience for ridership, significant impairment of daily activities and increased expenditures by the District
What should residents consider about Finding F3-mac-chair: The Grand Jury finds SacRT GO riders lost access to the Ecolane tracking app for an extended period of time, without clear and effective communication from the District, including the use of all available communication channels, resulting in a frustrating experience for ridership, significant impairment of daily activities and increased expenditures by the District, and the County’s response?
Sacramento Regional Transit District Board of Directors; William Charles Johnson, MAC Chair (personal views)Audit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
This unnumbered app-transition discussion implicitly disputes the degree of impact and provides a usage estimate. It does not directly take a formal position on F3 or fully address lost tracking and increased expenditure. The chair’s platform account also differs from SacRT’s account.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
2/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 1/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 1/2
4/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 1/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 1/2
This unnumbered app-transition discussion implicitly disputes the degree of impact and provides a usage estimate. It does not directly take a formal position on F3 or fully address lost tracking and increased expenditure. The chair’s platform account also differs from SacRT’s account.
Scoring confidence: medium
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...