Response says
The district partially disagrees: it accepts racial overidentification but disputes the state absenteeism classification.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F2
The CDE has identified Natomas SELPA as a special education program that overidentifies African American/Black students as emotionally disturbed and that has an excessive number of African American/Black special education students missing school
What should residents consider about Finding F2: The CDE has identified Natomas SELPA as a special education program that overidentifies African American/Black students as emotionally disturbed and that has an excessive number of African American/Black special education students missing school, and the County’s response?
Natomas Unified School District Board of EducationAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The two propositions are explicitly separated and the accepted and disputed portions are identified. No underlying determination letter is attached.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
4/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 1/2
- Support traceability
- 1/2
The two propositions are explicitly separated and the accepted and disputed portions are identified. No underlying determination letter is attached.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...