Response says
The district disagrees that CDE cited significant disproportionality in chronic absenteeism.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F1
Natomas District has received a citation from CDE for significant disproportionality in chronic absenteeism, which adversely affects students because students who are chronically absent miss critical instruction time
What should residents consider about Finding F1: Natomas District has received a citation from CDE for significant disproportionality in chronic absenteeism, which adversely affects students because students who are chronically absent miss critical instruction time, and the County’s response?
Natomas Unified School District Board of EducationAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The response identifies the precise disputed classification, explains annual determinations and cites IDEA and 34 CFR 300.600–300.604. It names the district determination letter but does not attach it.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The response identifies the precise disputed classification, explains annual determinations and cites IDEA and 34 CFR 300.600–300.604. It names the district determination letter but does not attach it.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...