Response says
The City agrees that its Code does not require commissioner training.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F7
The City’s Code does not require Commissioners to receive training on oversight procedures, applicable law, and policing issues, undermining their ability to serve as an effective advisory body (R6)
What should residents consider about Finding F7: The City’s Code does not require Commissioners to receive training on oversight procedures, applicable law, and policing issues, undermining their ability to serve as an effective advisory body (R6), and the County’s response?
City of SacramentoResponse dated 2026-09-08Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Explicit agreement satisfies the position requirement and covers the formal finding. Planned training is discussed under R6 rather than treated as a Code change.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
2/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 0/2
- Support traceability
- 0/2
Explicit agreement satisfies the position requirement and covers the formal finding. Planned training is discussed under R6 rather than treated as a Code change.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...