Response says
The City disagrees, citing its Recommendation Submission and Response form and transparency webpage.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F6
Neither the Commission nor SPD has a procedure to track the implementation of Commission recommendations, thereby preventing knowledge of their status (R5)
What should residents consider about Finding F6: Neither the Commission nor SPD has a procedure to track the implementation of Commission recommendations, thereby preventing knowledge of their status (R5), and the County’s response?
City of SacramentoResponse dated 2026-09-08Audit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Named status fields and historical use from 2018–2023 provide traceable reasons. No submissions since then are acknowledged, so current comprehensive coverage remains unproven.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Named status fields and historical use from 2018–2023 provide traceable reasons. No submissions since then are acknowledged, so current comprehensive coverage remains unproven.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...