Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Finding F7

Finding F7

Findings and Recommendations

The 2025-26 SELPA plan does not accurately reflect the provision of transition services to students, which could give the impression the SELPA is doing nothing.

Jury report: The Natomas Unified School District Special Education Program Struggles to Meet Student Needs · PDF page 12

Permanent link

Official response

Natomas Unified School District Board of Education

The district disagrees and describes the SELPA plan as a snapshot of services at drafting.

Read official response · PDF page 7

The timing explanation engages the disputed representation but does not supply the underlying plan or reconcile missing service codes.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all findingsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions