Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Finding F6

Finding F6

Findings and Recommendations

Natomas case managers do not consistently write transition plans as required by federal law, which deprives special education students of opportunities to prepare for life after high school.

Jury report: The Natomas Unified School District Special Education Program Struggles to Meet Student Needs · PDF page 12

Permanent link

Official response

Natomas Unified School District Board of Education

The district disagrees and asserts that all students who require transition plans have them.

Read official response · PDF page 6

The scope is clear but the response repeats a contrary conclusion without explaining the jury’s compliance data or supplying a supporting dataset.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all findingsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions