Response says
Agrees it has not performed its own PEPRA studies; cites CalPERS tier analysis and promises annual tier data.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F11
The Board of Supervisors has performed no data studies on the impact PEPRA is likely to have.
What should residents consider about Finding F11: The Board of Supervisors has performed no data studies on the impact PEPRA is likely to have., and the County’s response?
Nevada County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
Agreement directly covers the absence of County studies. The response identifies actuarial reports and describes employee counts, normal costs and liability data planned for annual reporting.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
Agreement directly covers the absence of County studies. The response identifies actuarial reports and describes employee counts, normal costs and liability data planned for annual reporting.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...