Response says
Agrees that PEPRA should help and describes employee-tier differences and cost sharing.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F10
The Board of Supervisors believes that California’s 2013 change from classic retirement to PEPRA will help the unfunded-pension-liability problem.
What should residents consider about Finding F10: The Board of Supervisors believes that California’s 2013 change from classic retirement to PEPRA will help the unfunded-pension-liability problem., and the County’s response?
Nevada County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The paragraph addresses the Board’s belief with pension-formula and cost-share reasoning. PEPRA provides an identified basis; the explanation and dated tier changes continue on page 4.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
6/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 2/2
The paragraph addresses the Board’s belief with pension-formula and cost-share reasoning. PEPRA provides an identified basis; the explanation and dated tier changes continue on page 4.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...