Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub

Recommendation R4

Recommendation R4

“The County’s response to this report should include in detail how much of the money from R2 the County expended each year to reduce its UPL beyond making the minimum amortization payment that CalPERS requires.

Jury report: Planning for the Future: The Board of Supervisors' Approach to the Growing $220-Million Problem of Unfunded Pension Liabilities · PDF page 23

Permanent link

Official response

Nevada County Board of Supervisors

Agency declines implementation

Will not implement; states no contributions above minimum amortization were made.

Read official response · PDF page 11

The stated absence of any additional contributions directly answers the requested additional-payment amount, while the paragraph explains the policy rationale. It does not imply trust deposits themselves reduced CalPERS liability.

This review evaluates the response document. Implementation claims have not been independently verified.

Back to all recommendationsExplore this cycle’s discussion questions