Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F4-MCBH

Feedback within privacy limits

What should residents consider about Finding F4-MCBH: Feedback within privacy limits, and the County’s response?

Mono County Sheriff; Mono County Behavioral Health Director; Mono County Board of Supervisors; Mammoth HospitalAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

Agrees about limits on individual-case feedback, offers aggregate annual data, and says 2025 referral results will be sent to MLPD in January 2026.

Audit analysis

Responds to the case-level limitation and proposes a distinct aggregate-data alternative without claiming it resolves every concern.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

10/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

6/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

Explicit agreement covers the finding; HIPAA is the identified basis, and the response explains case-level versus aggregate reporting.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is