Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← All civic questions
Rural priorities and sustainable funding

What information should residents receive before considering dedicated parcel funding or a vehicle-abatement program?

R2 calls for a feasibility report by February 1, 2027; R4 calls for gauging interest in a parcel assessment tax before any proposed ballot measure. F6’s no-General-Fund-risk statement remains the jury’s conclusion, not independently verified financial assurance.

Why this matters

Clear costs, benefits and uncertainties can support an informed choice without treating a recommendation as an approved tax.

Participate in this conversation

Public participation

Participate in this conversation

Use Pol.is below to respond to statements, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is

Supporting evidence

Evidence from the report

This Phase 1 citation points back to the source material that informed the civic question.

Supporting report

Code Compliance for Economic Development

Report section
Recommendations R2 and R4; Findings F6
Source citation
Code Compliance for Economic Development, Recommendations R2 and R4; Findings F6, physical PDF pages 14–15 (printed pages 10–11).
View referenced source