Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Report overview
Response synthesis and audit

Board and Auditor responses to technology transitions

The Board describes progress, support programs, a phased Tyler transition, an Oracle Accounts Receivable target, and a personal-device review. The Auditor accepts the assigned finding and promises implementation of the assigned recommendations without added schedules.

Official response PDFOfficial report PDF

Response by Mariposa County Board of Supervisors and Mariposa County Auditor

6

Addressed

7

Partially addressed

0

Not addressed

0

Unclear

County's stated disposition

These categories reflect the County's response to each recommendation, separate from this audit's assessment.

0

Implemented

6

Will be implemented

0

Requires further analysis

0

Will not be implemented

2

Unclear

How to read this audit

This review assesses the response document, not independently verified implementation, factual accuracy, or legal compliance. Each audit identifies its respondent and letter date. Page citations refer to the assembled response packet.

Commitments

Actions stated in the response

These are commitments extracted from the County's response. They describe what the response says will happen; they do not verify that implementation occurred.

7

Extracted commitments

4

Definite or bounded timing

0

Conditional timing

3

No timeframe

F4 — Board · Bounded timeframe

Review personal equipment approvals and security measures.

Within six months.

R3 — Board · Bounded timeframe

Implement the Tyler permitting system through a phased paper-to-digital transition.

Full implementation expected to take up to three years.

R4 — Board · Bounded timeframe

Implement Oracle Accounts Receivable.

By June 2025.

R5 — Board · Bounded timeframe

Review use of private cell phones for County work.

Within six months.

R1 — Auditor · No timeframe stated

Implement the recommendation concerning as400 transition planning.

No target date stated

R2 — Auditor · No timeframe stated

Implement the recommendation concerning eliminating duplicate entry.

No target date stated

R4 — Auditor · No timeframe stated

Implement the recommendation concerning oracle accounts receivable implementation.

No target date stated

Item-by-item review

Findings and recommendations

Assessments describe whether the response engages each cited item. Finding scores separately describe statutory-elements completeness under California Penal Code § 933.05(a) and public usefulness. They do not independently verify the response or constitute a legal conclusion.

Showing 13 of 13 items

finding · F1 — Board

Duplicate data entry

Audit: Addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Partly agrees; says duplicate entry remains but has been reduced in many areas.

Audit analysis

The disputed extent is explained, but the response does not quantify reduced errors or time and identifies no supporting record.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

7/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

3/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
1/2
Reason specificity
1/2
Support traceability
1/2

The disputed extent is explained, but the response does not quantify reduced errors or time and identifies no supporting record.

Scoring confidence: high

Report page 3Response page 11
Discuss finding and response

finding · F2 — Board

Tyler implementation risks

Audit: Addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Disagrees, citing a carefully developed schedule, dedicated transition team, and lessons from prior implementations.

Audit analysis

The response explains schedule preparation but does not directly resolve the cited platform limitation; no schedule or technical assessment is identified.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

8/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

4/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
1/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
1/2

The response explains schedule preparation but does not directly resolve the cited platform limitation; no schedule or technical assessment is identified.

Scoring confidence: high

Report page 3Response page 11
Discuss finding and response

finding · F3 — Board

Software training and support

Audit: Addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Partly agrees, distinguishing uneven adoption from the availability of training, help sessions, support email, and implementation-partner assistance.

Audit analysis

The response identifies the disputed scope and concrete support channels, including recurring sessions and a twenty-four-hour email response target.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

9/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

5/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
1/2

The response identifies the disputed scope and concrete support channels, including recurring sessions and a twenty-four-hour email response target.

Scoring confidence: high

Report page 3Response page 12
Discuss finding and response

finding · F4 — Board

Personal phones and security

Audit: Partially addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Partly agrees, cites a 2012 security policy, and promises a six-month review of approvals and safeguards.

Audit analysis

The policy and timeframe are traceable and the response addresses security checks, but it does not clearly state which part of the finding is disputed.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

9/10

3/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
1/2

6/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
2/2
Support traceability
2/2

The policy and timeframe are traceable and the response addresses security checks, but it does not clearly state which part of the finding is disputed.

Scoring confidence: high

Extracted commitments

Review personal equipment approvals and security measures.

Responsible party
Mariposa County Board of Supervisors
Timing
Within six months. · Bounded timeframe
Report page 3Response page 12
Discuss finding and response

recommendation · R1 — Board

AS400 transition plan

County: UnclearAudit: Partially addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Agrees.

Audit analysis

The response supplies no implementation disposition, method, or timetable.

Report page 3Response page 12

recommendation · R2 — Board

Eliminate duplicate entry

County: UnclearAudit: Partially addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Agrees.

Audit analysis

The response supplies no implementation disposition, method, or timetable.

Report page 3Response page 12

recommendation · R3 — Board

Phased Tyler implementation

County: Will be implementedAudit: Addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Agrees and describes a phased transition expected to take up to three years.

Audit analysis

The response identifies a phased approach and duration but does not supply a dated rollout schedule.

Extracted commitments

Implement the Tyler permitting system through a phased paper-to-digital transition.

Responsible party
Mariposa County Board of Supervisors
Timing
Full implementation expected to take up to three years. · Bounded timeframe
Report page 3Response page 12

recommendation · R4 — Board

Oracle Accounts Receivable

County: Will be implementedAudit: Partially addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Reports meetings have begun and promises implementation by June 2025.

Audit analysis

The response provides a concrete target for Accounts Receivable but does not specify the recommendation’s other incomplete areas.

Extracted commitments

Implement Oracle Accounts Receivable.

Responsible party
Mariposa County Board of Supervisors
Timing
By June 2025. · Bounded timeframe
Report page 3Response page 12

recommendation · R5 — Board

Review private phones

County: Will be implementedAudit: Addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Promises a review within six months, referring to the security review under F4.

Audit analysis

The response states an action and timeframe tied to personal-device approvals and safeguards.

Extracted commitments

Review use of private cell phones for County work.

Responsible party
Mariposa County Board of Supervisors
Timing
Within six months. · Bounded timeframe
Report page 4Response page 12

finding · F1 — Auditor

Duplicate data entry

Audit: Addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Auditor: Agrees.

Audit analysis

The finding is explicitly accepted without explanation or supporting evidence.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

6/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

2/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
0/2
Support traceability
0/2

The finding is explicitly accepted without explanation or supporting evidence.

Scoring confidence: high

Report page 3Response page 7
Discuss finding and response

recommendation · R1 — Auditor

AS400 transition planning

County: Will be implementedAudit: Partially addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Auditor: Will implement the recommendation.

Audit analysis

The response commits to action but adds no implementation method or timetable.

Extracted commitments

Implement the recommendation concerning as400 transition planning.

Responsible party
Mariposa County Auditor
Timing
No timeframe stated
Report page 3Response page 7

recommendation · R2 — Auditor

Eliminating duplicate entry

County: Will be implementedAudit: Partially addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Auditor: Will implement the recommendation.

Audit analysis

The response commits to action but adds no implementation method or timetable.

Extracted commitments

Implement the recommendation concerning eliminating duplicate entry.

Responsible party
Mariposa County Auditor
Timing
No timeframe stated
Report page 3Response page 7

recommendation · R4 — Auditor

Oracle Accounts Receivable implementation

County: Will be implementedAudit: Partially addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Auditor: Will implement the recommendation.

Audit analysis

The response commits to action but adds no implementation method or timetable.

Extracted commitments

Implement the recommendation concerning oracle accounts receivable implementation.

Responsible party
Mariposa County Auditor
Timing
No timeframe stated
Report page 3Response page 7