Response says
John C. Fremont Healthcare District Board of Directors: Agrees; says the previous Board vetted the inherited interim CEO and an outside agency vetted the last permanent hire.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F3 — Healthcare District
Interim CEO vetting
What should residents consider about Finding F3 — Healthcare District: Interim CEO vetting, and the County’s response?
John C. Fremont Healthcare District Board of DirectorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The response accepts the finding and explains which Board and process handled appointments, without identifying vetting records.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
5/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 1/2
The response accepts the finding and explains which Board and process handled appointments, without identifying vetting records.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...