Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F2 — Healthcare District

District consultant-contract controls

What should residents consider about Finding F2 — Healthcare District: District consultant-contract controls, and the County’s response?

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors and John C. Fremont Healthcare District Board of DirectorsAudit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussion

Audit context

What the response says and how it was assessed

Response says

John C. Fremont Healthcare District Board of Directors: Disagrees and says clear contract procedures already exist.

Audit analysis

The disputed claim is identified, but the explanation merely restates the opposite conclusion. No procedure is named and the alleged delivery and cost effects are not addressed.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

4/10

3/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
1/2

1/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
1/2
Reason specificity
0/2
Support traceability
0/2

The disputed claim is identified, but the explanation merely restates the opposite conclusion. No procedure is named and the alleged delivery and cost effects are not addressed.

Scoring confidence: high

Public participation

Discuss the finding and response

Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is