Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← Report overview
Response synthesis and audit

Board response to director evaluations

The Board accepts the lack of clear written evaluation procedures and links future procedures to a proposed shift in reporting responsibility to the CAO.

Official response PDFOfficial report PDF

Response by Mariposa County Board of Supervisors

1

Addressed

1

Partially addressed

0

Not addressed

0

Unclear

County's stated disposition

These categories reflect the County's response to each recommendation, separate from this audit's assessment.

0

Implemented

1

Will be implemented

0

Requires further analysis

0

Will not be implemented

0

Unclear

How to read this audit

This review assesses the response document, not independently verified implementation, factual accuracy, or legal compliance. Each audit identifies its respondent and letter date. Page citations refer to the assembled response packet.

Commitments

Actions stated in the response

These are commitments extracted from the County's response. They describe what the response says will happen; they do not verify that implementation occurred.

1

Extracted commitments

1

Definite or bounded timing

0

Conditional timing

0

No timeframe

F1 — Board · Bounded timeframe

Formalize department director evaluations.

Within twelve months.

Item-by-item review

Findings and recommendations

Assessments describe whether the response engages each cited item. Finding scores separately describe statutory-elements completeness under California Penal Code § 933.05(a) and public usefulness. They do not independently verify the response or constitute a legal conclusion.

Showing 2 of 2 items

finding · F1 — Board

Written evaluation procedures

Audit: Addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Agrees and says evaluations will be formalized within twelve months.

Audit analysis

The finding is accepted with a specific future action but no supporting evaluation record.

Finding-response score

Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.

8/10

4/4

Statutory elements

Stated position
2/2
Applicable disagreement elements
2/2

4/6

Public usefulness

Coverage
2/2
Reason specificity
1/2
Support traceability
1/2

The finding is accepted with a specific future action but no supporting evaluation record.

Scoring confidence: high

Extracted commitments

Formalize department director evaluations.

Responsible party
Mariposa County Board of Supervisors
Timing
Within twelve months. · Bounded timeframe
Report page 2Response page 15
Discuss finding and response

recommendation · R1 — Board

Consistent director-review process

County: Will be implementedAudit: Partially addressed

Response says

Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Partly agrees and links procedure development to the organizational study’s proposed CAO reporting structure (continued on packet page 16).

Audit analysis

Read with the F1 commitment, the response identifies future work, but the recommendation paragraph leaves the procedure and accountability measures unspecified.

Report page 2Response page 15