Response says
Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Partly agrees and attributes strain to Oracle implementation and missed budget and audit deadlines.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F5 — Board
Auditor–Administration working relationships
What should residents consider about Finding F5 — Board: Auditor–Administration working relationships, and the County’s response?
Mariposa County Board of Supervisors and Mariposa County AuditorAudit assessment: Partially addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The explanation is specific to the finding, but the exact disputed portion is not identified and no supporting record is named.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
3/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 1/2
5/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 2/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 1/2
The explanation is specific to the finding, but the exact disputed portion is not identified and no supporting record is named.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...