Response says
Mariposa County Board of Supervisors: Disagrees, saying separate responses are redundant and that invited officials’ feedback is incorporated in its letter.
← Back to this finding in the response audit
Public discussion · Finding F2 — Board
Invited individual responses
What should residents consider about Finding F2 — Board: Invited individual responses, and the County’s response?
Mariposa County Board of SupervisorsAudit assessment: Addressed
Participate in this discussionAudit context
What the response says and how it was assessed
Audit analysis
The Board explains its consolidated-response policy, but does not directly address the reported impression that independent comments are unwelcome.
Finding-response score
Document completeness and usefulness—not factual verification or a legal conclusion.
4/4
Statutory elements
- Stated position
- 2/2
- Applicable disagreement elements
- 2/2
4/6
Public usefulness
- Coverage
- 1/2
- Reason specificity
- 2/2
- Support traceability
- 1/2
The Board explains its consolidated-response policy, but does not directly address the reported impression that independent comments are unwelcome.
Scoring confidence: high
Source pages
Review the underlying documents
Public participation
Discuss the finding and response
Use Pol.is to discuss both the Grand Jury finding and the County’s response, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider. Participant statements do not alter this audit or verify factual claims made by any participant or source document.
Loading the Pol.is conversation...