Skip to content
Grand Jury Hub
← All civic questions
Accountable public institutions

What should a consistent director evaluation process measure about public service and departmental performance?

The jury recommends clear written procedures for evaluating department directors within twelve months.

Why this matters

Residents benefit when leadership expectations are clear and problems receive follow-up.

Participate in this conversation

Public participation

Participate in this conversation

Use Pol.is below to respond to statements, see where participants agree, and add a perspective for others to consider.

Loading the Pol.is conversation...
Open on Pol.is

Supporting evidence

Evidence from the report

This Phase 1 citation points back to the source material that informed the civic question.

Supporting report

Evaluation of Department Directors

Report section
Finding F1 and Recommendation R1
Source citation
Evaluation of Department Directors, Finding F1 and Recommendation R1, PDF page 2.
View referenced source